Groups | Blog | Home
all groups > sql server clustering > october 2007 >

sql server clustering : SQL Server and File Server


Russ Kaufmann [MVP]
10/24/2007 2:29:22 PM
[quoted text, click to view]

What are the business requirements? If you are clustering because of a SQL
need, which is probably an extremely vital need, then adding file sharing on
top of it will result in increased risks to your SQL environment. The whole
purpose of doing High Availability is to reduce risk, and this configuration
would not be the best solution.

If the company has a huge demand for redudant file services, then consider
either a second cluster or implementing DFS with replication.


--
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp

The next ClusterHelp classes are:
Dec 10 - 13 in Denver
Jan 21 - 24 in New York
Jacques Demers
10/24/2007 3:37:32 PM
Hi,
Can someone give me an opinion with installing SQL Server 2005 with
clustering and use those servers for file servers at the same time.
Thanks
Jacques

Russ Kaufmann [MVP]
10/24/2007 3:44:56 PM
[quoted text, click to view]

Not only the verbose version, but I still beat you to it by three minutes.
<G>


--
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp

The next ClusterHelp classes are:
Dec 10 - 13 in Denver
Jan 21 - 24 in New York
Geoff N. Hiten
10/24/2007 4:32:01 PM
Don't.

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP


[quoted text, click to view]
Geoff N. Hiten
10/24/2007 4:56:30 PM
Had to go with the verbose version, didn't you? :)

--
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP


[quoted text, click to view]
Jacques Demers
10/25/2007 12:00:00 AM
Thank you guys.

"Russ Kaufmann [MVP]" <russ@clusterhelp.com> a écrit dans le message de
news: D44B6F30-471A-4628-81BA-761637187EA1@microsoft.com...
[quoted text, click to view]

Russ Kaufmann [MVP]
10/26/2007 9:20:04 AM
[quoted text, click to view]

Nobody here can answer that for you. It completely depends on your
environment.

--
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp

The next ClusterHelp classes are:
Dec 10 - 13 in Denver
Jan 21 - 24 in New York
Jacques Demers
10/26/2007 10:55:57 AM
Hi Russ,
Thank you for the information. But I should have explain a little more why
we want to install SQL Server 2005 in cluster on the file servers who are
already using Microsoft cluster. The reason is that we want to install
SharePoint Portal Server 2007 with SQL Server 2005 in clustering­. When
SharePoint will be accessible the files on the file servers would eventually
be transfered in the portal on the SQL server. This way the files servers
would eventually becomes only SQL servers. What do you think, do you think
the servers would be able to take the load?
Thank you
Jacques


"Russ Kaufmann [MVP]" <russ@clusterhelp.com> a écrit dans le message de
news: D44B6F30-471A-4628-81BA-761637187EA1@microsoft.com...
[quoted text, click to view]

Jacques Demers
10/26/2007 11:34:37 AM
Thank you

"Russ Kaufmann [MVP]" <russ@clusterhelp.com> a écrit dans le message de
news: 3D2E2893-C8C9-4473-A5EE-D06D6C0CFC81@microsoft.com...
[quoted text, click to view]

AddThis Social Bookmark Button