Windows failover clustering doesn't support complex failover policies such
as cascading the failover among multiple nodes in a certain order. There is
little need for this type of policy in my opinion.
I'm curious as to whether you have any practical reason for such a
requirement.
Linchi
[quoted text, click to view] "Hassan" <hassan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uHBO8os4HHA.3716@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Is there any article where one can set up say a 4 node cluster with 2 or 3
> instances?
>
> If I have a 4 node cluster with 2 instances and say instance 1 and 2 are
> tied to node 1 and node 2 respectively... is there any priority where we
> can specify that if node 1 fails, instance 1 will move to node 3 and if
> node 3 is down, then it would fail to node 4. Can you have those types of
> settings where you can fail in order of priority ?
>
>
>