We need more info, about mem, disk and pro usage ..
Trace the slow querys, and use database engine tunign advisor to fix it...
document explaining the behaivor.. an you can find in MSFT KB
"Tom Moreau" wrote:
> Did you update statistics WITH FULLSCAN after the migration?
>
> --
> Tom
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
> SQL Server MVP
> Toronto, ON Canada
>
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
>
>
> "Moishe Much" <MoisheMuch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:39A6EC1A-07FB-4813-939F-9A5DB7D2AA12@microsoft.com...
> We just migrated a large database from SQL 2000 ent ed. to SQL 2005 ent. ed.
> This migration included moving to larger, faster hardware on an
> active-passive clustered pair of Win 2003 servers (32 GB RAM, quad
> processors, etc).
>
> Once the migration & compatibility changes to the database were complete, we
> found that many of our queries and inserts that ran quickly and well on the
> old 2000 system now take excessive amounts of time to run in the newer,
> larger, faster, clustered environment. Queries and inserts that ran in a
> minute or less take two hours or more to complete now.
>
> We're baffled by this, since it seems to indicate that in a larger, faster,
> clustered environment, SQL 2005 may require us to go back and custom tune
> hundreds of queries and inserts.
>
> Have you experienced this or know why SQL Server 2005 would perform so
> poorly in a newer, larger, faster clustered environment?
>
> Regards
>