BETA IS NOT AN EXCUSE TO ADD A PROBLEM, that they, MICROSOFT, said they were
IT's NOT really a bug, it's a complete design error. BIG DIFFERENCE.
"Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer) [MVP]" <NoSpamMgbworld@comcast.netNoSpamM> wrote
in message news:e0jbwzDYEHA.996@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Issue #1:
> You took some 1.1 code and ran it in 2.0. It changed one attribute, so you
> feel the need to bitch numerous times about a BETA product. DO I have this
> about right?
>
> 1. It is a beta
>
> 2. This is a very non-productive way to air grievances. On the scale of
sit
> down discussions to blowing someone's head off, this one sits somewhere
> around whacking someone in the face with a baseball bat.
>
> 3. Your code and tags were not touched. An attribute, or rather directive,
> was added, which is used by 2.0.
>
> 4. There is documentation about this attribute, which explain its
> importance.
>
http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dv_vwdcon/html/bb4e5b44-e2b0-48ab-bbe9-609fb33900b6.asp
>
> You can also find pre-beta 1 docs on it:
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vs2005/currentreadme/default.aspx >
> 5. There are other ways to get the message across than yelling. There is a
> whole site for bugs and suggestions.
>
> 6. Once again, it is a beta.
>
> Issue #2:
> ---------
> As for the localhost:##### designation, you do not have to do that. If you
> would actually read the docs, you will find that you can set up a website
in
> a variety of ways. By default, the web is set up using a webserver other
> than IIS. This allows web development without Windows XP Pro or a server
OS.
> It is quite useful. You have the option of setting up an IIS web, as well,
> by browsing and specifying your own URL. While it may seem CRAPPY to you,
> the addition of the "Cassini" web server to Visual Studio products adds
> options for people who either a) do not know how to set up IIS or b)
worse,
> do not have IIS.
>
>
> Issue #3:
> ---------
> Do you really need to cross post to every non-ASP.NET 2.0 group and SPAM
up
> the newsgroups. This is a major breech of Netiquette. I am not trying to
> censor you by any means, as I can understand the frustration. I do not see
> the major beef, as the product is still in beta and possible to be
tweaked,
> but I do not feel it is productive to simply stand up in the middle of the
> theater and scream while the movie is still in production.
>
> --
> Gregory A. Beamer
> MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
>
> ************************************************
> Think Outside the Box!
> ************************************************
> "ik" <ikll@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ufTShaDYEHA.2216@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > DEAR MICROSOFT:
> >
> > STOP TOUCHING MY CODE!!!!!!
> >
> > Stop ADDING these attributes to my tags
> >
> > meta:resourcekey="LiteralResource3"
> >
> >
> > Your Web Developer 2005 express added that crappy and unneeded attribute
> to
> > all my tags on my aspx page...you even added that attribute to the @page
> > directive. The people who actually do work might have to to bounce back
to
> a
> > better HTML editor and NOT use 2.0 OR I don't even want that attribute
in
> > the first place as I don't place to use .resx files anyway.....
> >
> > GET IT THROUGH YOUR STUPID HEAD THAT YOU ARE NEVER TO PUT CODE WHEN I
> DON"T
> > KNOW ABOUT IT, NOR SHOULD I HAVE TO GO ON A SCAVENGER HUNT TO FIND IT IN
> THE
> > SETTINGS JUNGLE.
> >
> > Who has responsible for doing this on the Microsoft team? ONe of number
> one
> > things Microsoft market was trumpeting was that VS.NET 2005 wasn't going
> to
> > touch your code...............
> >
> > DON'T DO THAT!!!
> >
> > GOT IT!!!!!!
> >
> >
> > NOW I HAVE TO GO AND REMOVE IT FOR ALL THE TAGS ON MY PAGE IF I WANT TO
> USE
> > .NET 1.1
> >
> > COMPRENDE!!!!!!!
> >
> > IT'S NO WONDER WHY ASP.NET hasn't been embraced by a significant number
of
> > asp developers, Old ASP developers can get more done using NON-MICROSOFT
> > TOOLS.....
> >
> >
> > DROP THE CRAPPY WEB PORT AS WELL..that's stupid, takes up resources and
> just
> > make debugging that much more difficult.
> >
> >
> > LOCALHOST:12345 <-- do we have to do it this way?
> >
> > Just show them how to set up IIS correctly. PHP, ASP, ColdFusion, Java
all
> > know how to do this manually, Why does microsoft have to screws things
up
> > again..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>